Sophism and a Baldwin

Stephen Baldwin, one of the worst actor in the history and a true insult to the Lumières brothers, is now an evangelist and has some very nice things to say that proves he's pretty much as thick as a wooden plank!

Let's read a few and comment, shall we?

ON DARWIN
Evolution isn't true, because if we evolved from monkeys, how can they still be here? (2010)

Although he's the proof some people have yet to evolve from monkeys.


ON GAY MARRIAGE
What's next? Will a woman marry her German Shepherd? Twenty years ago, the US mainstream considered gay marriage just as wrong and misguided as a woman marrying her dog (2006)

But your wife DID marry a dog, didn't she?


ON THE 2008 ELECTION
I believe John McCain is going to be the next president of the United Straights [sic]… If Barack Obama is elected, I'll be moving out of the country (2008)

No! Stay there and ruin THEIR lives!

ON TALKING WITH GOD
Not a lot of individuals get to refer to the Lord in their prayers as "Dude", but he's doing a new thing with me (2005)

Aw, for crying out loud!

DISMISSING A BOOK RECOMMENDATION BY A FELLOW AIRPLANE PASSENGER
When I have the Bible memorised, then I'll be able to go and read a couple other books (2007)

Reading, "dude"? Honestly? Although, he won't go past a couple.

More here to prove the US are still un nid de cons, quand même ¬¬

Over here, people like him have the decency to shut up. Or at least, not to be listened to or even remotely taken seriously.

Love + conservatism = bollocks!

Joan Smith: Tories are romantic about marriage – and wrong

Sunday, 3 January 2010 - The Independent

The Tories are a bunch of hopeless romantics. They want us to get married and stay married, a message that might seem a little ill-timed as we emerge from ten days in close proximity to our loved ones.

Both main parties want more support for fathers, which is no bad thing, but the headline-grabbing bit of the Tories' agenda is tax advantages for married couples. Labour can't go down that route, but ministers have started saying they need to refocus policy on families rather than single mothers and children.

I wouldn't mind this if the debate had more connection with reality. What the Conservatives denounce as Britain's "broken society" applies to a minority of the population, and it's actually a series of interconnected problems which won't be solved by persuading everyone to get hitched.

First and foremost is the fact that too many teenage girls get pregnant, exposing themselves to a life of emotional instability and serial relationships. I don't want these girls to get married; I'd like them to be freed from the pressure to have sex too young, which can be achieved through compulsory sex education in schools. That's what the Government is proposing for older teenagers, acknowledging that many parents aren't equipped to do it, but it's prompted hysterical opposition from "pro-family" and religious pressure groups.

The Tories have bolted themselves to a lost cause – keeping sex within marriage – when most people no longer live like that. David Willetts, who speaks on family policy for the Conservatives, is worried that marriage is becoming the preserve of the educated middle class; the number of marriages has reached a historic low of 270,000 compared with almost half a million in 1972. But what that statistic means is another matter altogether.

The Tories are fond of quoting figures which suggest that married parents are more likely to stay together, but that may just say something about the kind of people who get married. Maybe they're more conventional or more affluent, but the notion of privileging them through the tax system is morally indefensible. If marriage is such a great institution, why do couples need to be bribed to enter it? Should those who leave a violent marriage really lose money? When the Home Office suggests that one woman in four will be a victim of domestic violence, this is not merely a theoretical question.

When politicians think about the family they mix up two issues: adult relationships and bringing up children. I'm keen on stable environments for adults and children but most of us are going to have two or three significant relationships in our longer lifetimes. In that sense, lifelong marriage is way past its sell-by date, creating unrealistic expectations which leave couples unprepared when they decide to split. What they need isn't tax breaks to stay married; it's practical advice on how to remain co-parents when the intimate and sexual aspects of their relationship are over.

Labour should have more to offer on this than the Conservatives, given that several members of the present Cabinet have chosen unconventional domestic arrangements.

Instead of allowing the Tories to make the running on family policy, ministers should build on one of the outstanding successes of Labour's period in office by extending civil partnerships to heterosexual couples. It's a reform that would be simple, progressive and popular – and which would expose the Tories' pointless nostalgia for the family of the 1950s.

To the great speech, I shall be grateful

Ireland has just voted a law punishing the crime of blasphemy that states that one can say anything that would target religion in any of its form. Hello again, the Inquisition!

Atheist Ireland (my new best friends) delibrately published blasphemeous quotes from famous people. Here's my favourite so far:

Richard Dawkins:

"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."

Eventually, I'll do something about the God of Christians, what a lovely person he is indeed just quoting what's been said, not in the Bible, but arround us everyday.

Pillocks!

From that blog I found yesterday:


France now in UK, say Mail messageboard genuises

It has often been said that the people who leave comments on the Daily Mail website don't read past the headline and first few lines before giving us all the benefit of their ignorant views. Usually the truth is buried towards the end of the article, when they have given up reading and started bashing out their bilious responses.

Vietnamese illegal immigrants hidden among speciality food on truck bound for UK is an accurate headline and the first sentence explains the rest:

A lorry carrying supplies to a Vietnamese restaurant in Birmingham had 13 illegal migrants on board when it was stopped in France.

Good. So the border police have stopped some illegal immigrants getting to the UK. Surely cause for the messageboard people to cheer? Well, no, because some of them haven't even read that first line properly:

Send them back this is happening every day and this government cannot handle it.
- D.Platten, Hull, 24/8/2009 14:55

I presume then that, within 2 or 3 weeks, the government will be giving them all council houses, 4-500 pounds per week, a free car and of course permanent residence.
- Mark Rees, San Francisco (Ex Pat), 24/8/2009 14:08

Check up in 6 months to see how many of them area still here.
- tony, sheffield, 24/8/2009 13:59

Why are they still in this country? They should have been shipped straight back too the safe country they had left, probably France
- s'me again Shane, Beverley East Yorkshire, 24/8/2009 13:45

Let me know if these people are deported in the next ten years.
- Dab, Cambs England, 24/8/2009 13:16

No doubt they will be allowed to stay , given a house and every benefit going.
- Jax, England., 24/8/2009 12:42

So, your starter for ten: which bit of 'stopped in France' do these idiots not understand?

Notice in particular the second comment by Mark Rees, who comes out with Carole Malone's 'free car' bullshit (an urban myth is born...), and claims they receive '4-500 pounds per week', rather than £35.

Needless to say these comments are all voted positive, but surely it brings into question once again how the Mail moderators are letting through such stupid comments. They have also published a few pointing out their error, but their policy on what they allow (comments that tow the line, even when they're completely factually wrong) and what they don't (comments pointing out errors and lies) seems the wrong way round entirely.

History is bloody riot!

As an historian, I love History. Some parts are quite boring but there’s always something you can pick up and like since its beginning 6000 years ago when humans starts to actually write things down.

But when you present it to much of the kids, they stay it’s dead boring. I agree. I mean the programme we want them to eat is pretty much…unbearable.

Yet I truly believe that when it comes to teaching, we can always find a way to divert some way somehow to make them see that humans being will be human beings and what interests them today could be found back then.

More easily sometimes, actually. Take the boys who like to play tough and watch horror movies where you can see people gruesomely tortured. Well here’s what you could see if you were to play in Paris in the Modern Era:

About François Ravaillaic after he killes Henry IV.

On May 27, he was taken to the Place de Grève and was tortured one last time before being pulled apart by four horses, a method of execution reserved for regicides. Alistair Horne describes the torture Ravaillac suffered: "Before being drawn and quartered... he was scalded with burning sulphur, molten lead and boiling oil and resin, his flesh then being torn by pincers." Following his execution, Ravaillac's parents were forced into exile and the rest of his family was ordered to never use the name "Ravaillac" again.


About Robert-François Damiens after he tried to assassinate Louis XV

He was tortured first with red-hot pincers; his hand, holding the knife used in the attempted assassination, was burned using sulphur; molten wax, lead, and boiling oil were poured into his wounds. Horses were then harnessed to his arms and legs for his dismemberment. Damiens' limbs and ligaments did not separate easily; after some hours, representatives of the Parlement ordered the executioner and his aides to cut Damiens' joints. Damiens was then dismembered, to the applause of the crowd. His torso, apparently still living, was then burnt at the stake. He is viewed by some people as the Guy Fawkes of France, since both of these men tried to kill their Kings but failed and were brutally executed.

I love the “brutally executed”. That’s so 2000! So American! So “war without any hurt”, with no collateral damage. Very clean world with no blood, no suffer, no expletives and no sex anywhere near your eyes and ears! For Fuck’s sake! Human history is a huge catalogue of crimes and blood is pouring in waterfalls from everywhere page of it.


Want sex, bitch, horrors and violence? No need to go to the bloody cinema and see Saw buggery VI!...Which, btw, in French is pronounced like “saucisse” which means sausage. And the next one will not be any better, it’s Saw VII…that sounds like “chaussette” (sock).


For instance, in France, we have a “problem”…well old narrow-minded bastards have a problems with young bloody pikeys who boo and jeer the national anthem (for Christ’s sake, it’s like Pavlov’s dog. They boo so you react, don’t react and they won’t do it anymore, you half wits!).

Well, it’s easy. Don’t just force them to sing it and love it. Show them what it’s actually saying. For those who aren’t French, here’s pretty much the translation of the part we always sing.

Come, children of the Fatherland,
The day of Glory has arrived!
Against us, tyranny’s
Bloody banner is raised,
Do you hear in the countryside
Those ferocious soldiers roaring?
They come up to your arms
To slit the throats of your sons and wives!

To arms, citizens!
Form your battalions!
Let’s march! Let’s march!
May an impure blood
Water our furrows!

And believe when I tell you the rest of it is pretty much the same.

Ask the kids what they want to see in history and take some time to show them that!

I want that!

Where I live, it must've rained for barely eight hours since July, 15th. And when I say "rain". It was more of a little mist or three huge drops for 10 minutes and that's it.

I never thought I would say that but I'm desperate for rain! The water tank under the house collecting the waters from the roof is empty and the garden on which I have been working my arse off for the past two years in dying in front of me!

Someone, something, somebody gives me rain! Real rain! The one that soaks everything to the brim, that makes the rivers overflow, that soaks people to the bones!

Pleeeeaaaase! Raaaaaiiiiin!!

Aw...my...fucking...god!

I was just wondering why the shapes of the clouds are what they are when an atomic bomb explodes and I found that: Tsar Bomb, a Hydrogen bomb, tested in 1961.



This is the biggest bomb ever exploded in the history of humanity.

Just numbers: the clouds went 64 kilometers up and 45 km wide in less than two minutes. The shock wave broke windows from northern Siberia all the way to Sweden and could still be heard three times after it went arround the planet. And created earthquakes from 5 to 7.1 on the Richter's scale.

I think it's time Nature takes its course and flushes us all now. And be carefull to wipe its touchy properly so none of us can remain and start all over again!

Quand on n'a rien à dire, on ferme sa gueule!

Ce matin, France Inter. Reportage à la 24h chrono/Urgences sur un fait totalement sans interêt: un fan de Toulouse s'est fait aggresser à Belgrade.

Beaucoup de mots biens longs et angoissants qui font professionel pour décrire comment va le mec: traumatisme cranien, aggravation de l'état de santé générale, angine de poitrine avec complication thrombotique et risque de fibrilation intraventriculaire, encéphalite méningitique façon myopatie de Duchêne...amanite phaloïde anticonstitutionnelle, enfin des trucs comme ça.

Et en ouverture une déclaration du minis...enfin de Rama Yade qui a dit: "Je condamne la violence dans le sport".

Rama Yade est le genre de minis...enfin de figure politique qui a chaque fois qu'il se passe quelque chose a des déclarations toutes prêtes et totalement sans interêt dont elle change un ou deux mots en fonction des situations.

Donc un fan aggressé à Belgrade. Déjà, ils en parlent comme si le mec s'était fait aggresser dans un quartier chic: "Quelle surprise!" Enfin c'est Belgrade, connards! Et le mec est un fan de football donc je ne pense pas qu'il se prelassait gentiment sans un mot avec un bouquin de Sartre dans un café huppé du quartiers des ambassades.

Alors "un fan de sport aggressé à Belgrade". On ne sais pas si le "fan de Toulouse" fut déterminant dans l'histoire mais Rama Yade condamne la violence dans le sport.

Demain, 10 autres femmes vont mourrir sous les coups de leur mari et quand les médias arrêteront de faire l'impasse dessus, Rama Yade viendra condamner la violence dans le couple.

A la fin de l'année, le bilan des morts sur la route en France depassera encore les 5000 et Rama Yade viendra condamner la violence sur la route.

Une mémé se fait arracher son sac à main, une du journal de TF1 avec interview du boucher, du facteur, de l'épicier arabe (avec sous-titres bien qu'il parle parfaitement français) et du patron de bar/tabac avec toutes les cigarettes bien en vue derrière...Et Rama Yade condamne la violence dans la rue.

Un lion attaque une gazelle et Rama Yade condamne la violence dans la savane africaine.

C'est inutile, c'est creux, ça ne sert à rien, ça ne change rien mais ça fait parler de soi.

Et en France, les journalistes sont très contents, ils ont leur citation d'entrée. Pas de commentaire, pas d'interview poussée pour savoir ce qu'elle compte faire de concret car ils sont trop occupés à feuilleter le Dictionnaire de la Médecine afin de mettre plus de suspens dans leurs reportages débiles.

Bienvenue à Cuba.

For those who don't speak French: what happened basically is our president went to visit some hardworking people in a factory.
But everytime he went the last times, the 'hardworking workers' welcomed him with shovels, rotten fruits and criticism (how dare they?!). Then he did what he always does and called them "fuckers!" in front of the tely.

So this time, France became Cuba/China/North Korea and all the potential opposants were removed from their machines and kept away from the factory before the President arrive. And replaced by other workers from other factories (all volunteers) and very important: They must NOT be taller than the President for the speech he did after they all subimissively greeted the Almighty Dictator with smiles and praises so everyone can see how loved and appreciated the Dictator is.

I said dictator?! Sorry I mean President. After all that's also how the head of state's called in China...

Je me demandais...

Pourquoi être contre le CPE et la précarité est-ce être « conservateur » ?
Pourquoi les acquis sociaux sont-ils considérés comme archaïques ?
Pourquoi les doctrines sociales du début du XXe dites « avancées » sont aujourd’hui montrées comme plus archaïques que la doctrine du libéralisme absolu d’Adam Smith datant du milieu du XVIIIe ?

Pourquoi la « flexibilité du travail » est-elle l’avenir ?
Pour parer à la concurrence des pays d’Asie où la main d’œuvre est plus flexible (servile pour les cyniques) ? Mais pourquoi alors doit-on toujours niveler par le bas ?

Pourquoi rendre les Européens aussi précaires que les Indiens ou les Chinois ? Pourquoi ne pas protéger ces derniers autant que nous ?...On irait alors vers l’Afrique ? De qui se moque-t-on ?

Pourquoi revenir aux journaliers du Moyen Age, aux mercelots du XIXe que l’on engageait
selon les besoins avant de les rebalancer sur les routes est-ce une avancée ?
Pourquoi traiter des êtres humains comme des matières premières à obtenir au moindre coût ?

Pourquoi refuser tout ça est-ce faire preuve d’égoïsme ?
Pourquoi est-il bon de se sacrifier pour l’économie mais pas pour le bonheur d’autrui ?


POURQUOI PREND-ON TOUJOURS LES GENS POUR DES CONS ?

Pourquoi dresse-t-on des épées de Damoclès au-dessus de chaque tête sans véritable raison ?

Peut-être pour les pousser à agir par réflexe…sans réfléchir…pour les empêcher de trouver d’autres réponses que celles des enfants d’Adam Smith…quelque chose qui changerait la façon de voir le monde présent que cette pensée unique…une véritable reforme ?

Mais où êtes-vous Keynes, Marx, Lénine et tous les autres ?…Où sont les Internationales socialistes, ouvrières ou que sais-je…? Où sont les alternatives ? Où sont les penseurs, merde ?!...

R.I.P Common Sense

I have to say it here but it’s getting on my nerves (what else is new?) and I can’t really say it outside but I don’t feel anything about Michael Jackson passing away. I never liked a single of song but Scream with Janet Jackson, I don’t like his persona, his demeanour, his work…nothing! I like his sister but not him. Never have, never will.

It’s tragic, of course. Someone who dies so young is always tragic. Especially if you consider the last 20 years of his life that were not among the happiest, one would easily agree.

What’s getting on my nerve is the world-wide hypocrisy now that he’s dead. Everyone is deeply saddened, shocked and can barely hold back their tears everytime they think about him…as they say. This is absolutely sickening!

Three days ago, he was still a horrible lying monster everyone, but his very few true fans, was laughing at when they were not calling him a megalomaniac and schizophrenic paedophile. He was publically humiliated everytime he stepped outside, made ashamed of every single of his moves and words.

Lately countless reporters went to Neverland to grant us with pompous and judgmental constitution-length articles on the appalling state of the park and how lonely and pathetic he now was. We had articles and documentaries on his drinking problems, on his marriages, his children with some fatuous, self-righteous people who never knew him commentating on the dreadful father he was supposed to be.

We had articles and interviews that described him as irritating diva who was asking for a horrendous and highly unjustified price for his last tour.

And now he’s dead and here he is: the fallen angel, the greatest of the greats, the Ninth World Wonder (the Eighth is Beckham, of course…).

Here we are comparing him to people like Maria Theresa and Lady Diana.

The comparaison with Elvis is right for he had a immense talent and brought something new and refreshing to the world of music. Even if I don’t like what he did, no one can deny it and I won’t. But I will put my foot down and rile on everyone who has the indecency and the insanity to compare him to the likes of Lady Di.

Lady Di was a woman of selflessness. She puts her life in danger walking of landmine fields, she confronted the worst going to villages of Sahel and slums of Calcutta to help the poorest and most miserable in the world. She fought until the very end for people to open their eyes and help others.

She was the Princess of the People. Michael Jackson was the King of the Pop like Madonna is its Queen.

Is Madonna Lady Di? As much I love and worship her music, no!

Michael Jackson was a musician who never gave more than his music. So spare us the hypocrite tears, you cowards. You had let him down, you had forsaken him and let him rot alone with a bottle of vodka. You had rejected him then had fed yourself on the sour milk of his misery and slanders created by those who wanted him down.

Now I even have friends who have never once mentioned him when talking about music, never bought a single album and can’t even give the name of a single song from him but who are saying they are in painful mourning.

I have never liked him yet also never judged him. In that way, I might not be sad or in mourning as “the rest of the world” according to the press, but I’m a better person.

Today's France is all his...unglory.

The President is supposed to represent France, to be its living symbol and he is doing perfectly.

The one who's riddled by an irrelevant inferiority complex and who wants to make himself as big as the others.

He could take the high road and try to prove one should not judge a book by its cover but how could he when he judges everyone and everything by their covers?

So he remains a pathetic twat and makes himself big by means of cheat.

It's fake. It's meaningless, pointless. There's no depth whatsoever. Just image matters.

Everyone can see it and honestly, when you see that, why would you go behind the cover and waste your time reading the book?

He's doomed to remain a twat and a dog desperately looking for a master.

1,000,000 United Against the BNP

Here's what people are voting for without knowing because they are Daily Mail and The Sun readers and they don't want to know, it's easier this way.

But here's what you are voting for.

Open your eyes and realise that you are now voting for the ones you British people sacrified so much to fight 60 years ago!

"[t]he British National Party’s determination not simply to stop any further mass immigration into the British Isles, but also to reverse the tide which has transformed vast areas of our country out of all recognition over the last fifty years. We, as the sole political representatives of the Silent Majority of the English, Scots, Irish and Welsh who formed and were formed by our island home, have one overriding demand: We want our country back!"

"We would repeal the Race Relations Acts and all other restrictions on free speech in Britain.... We would abolish all departments, agencies, or other units of government whose sole and specific purpose is to deal with ethnic issues, grievances, or crimes.... We would abolish all laws against racial discrimination in employment and the government bodies associated with enforcing them."

"A Clause 28-style proscription against the promotion of racial integration in schools and the media would be introduced."

"This wicked, vicious faith has expanded from a handful of cranky lunatics about 1,300 years ago, to it's now sweeping country after country before it, all over the world. And if you read that book (the Koran), you'll find that that's what they want." - Nick Griffin
"It is more important to control the streets of a city than its council chamber." - Nick Griffin
“The electors of Millwall did not back a post-modernist Rightist Party, but what they perceived to be a strong, disciplined organisation with the ability to back up its slogan “Defend Rights for Whites’ with well-directed boots and fists. When the crunch comes, POWER IS THE PRODUCT OF FORCE AND WILL, NOT OF RATIONAL DEBATE.” - Nick Griffin

"I am only going to represent the white people. I WILL NOT REPRESENT ASIANS. I will not do anything for them. They have no right to be in my great country." - Derek Beackon

"When we get to power OUR OPPONENTS WILL BE SWEPT AWAY like flies." - John Tyndall

"Very few people in Britain are aware of the huge influence over the mass media exercised by a certain ethnic minority, namely the Jews." - Nick Griffin

“The controllers of Hollywood, almost entirely Jewish. Some 'ANTI-SEMITISM' MAY BE PROVOKED BY THE ACTIONS OF CERTAIN JEWS THEMSELVES and thereby have a RATIONAL BASIS”. - Nick Griffin

"There is no doubt that hundreds, probably thousands of Jews were shot to death in Eastern Europe, because they were rightly or wrongly seen as communists or potential partisan supporters. That was awful. But THIS NONSENSE ABOUT GAS CHAMBERS is exposed as a total lie." - Nick Griffin

"[t]his BLOODY JEW [Alex Carlile MP] whose only claim is that his grandparents died in the Holocaust." - Nick Griffin

"There's not a European country the Jews haven't been thrown out of. When it happens that many times, it's not just persecution. THERE'S NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE." - Mark Collett

"Without the White race nothing matters [other right-wing parties] believe that the answer to the race question is integration and a futile attempt to create "Black Britons", while we affirm that NON-WHITES HAVE NO PLACE HERE AT ALL AND WILL NOT REST UNTIL EVERY LAST ONE HAS LEFT OUR LAND." - Nick Griffin

"Yes, Adolf went a bit too far. His legacy is the biggest problem that the British nationalist movement has to deal with. It just creates a bad image." - Nick Griffin

"There is a STRONG, DIRECT LINK from Oswald Mosley to me." - Nick Griffin

“The TV footage of dozens of ‘gay’ demonstrators flaunting their perversions in front of the world’s journalists showed just why so many ordinary people find these CREATURES so repulsive.” - Nick Griffin

"Churchill was a fucking cunt who led us into a pointless war with other whites [the Nazis] standing up for their race." - Mark Collett

"He's a fucking traitor." - Mark Collett on the Prince of Wales
"The Royals have betrayed their people. When we're in power they'll be WIPED OUT and we'll get some Germans to rule properly." - Mark Collett

"A FRIENDLY DISEASE because blacks, drug users and gays have it." - Mark Collett on AIDS

"Hitler will live forever; and maybe I will." - Mark Collett

"The sick minds who would have us believe that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz are completely twisted." - Tony Lecomber

"Asians are rubbish, and that is what WE ARE GOING TO CLEAR FROM THE STREETS." - Derek Beackon

"Those responsible for creating this multi-racial hell hole must face trial and pay the ultimate penalty." - Nick Griffin

"AIDS Monkeys.... bum bandits.... faggots." - Mark Collett on homosexuals

"Racial laws will be enacted FORBIDDING MARRIAGE between Britons and non-Aryans: medical measures will be taken to prevent procreation on the part of all those who have hereditary defects either racial, mental or physical." - John Tyndall

"Mein Kampf is my Bible." - John Tyndall

"[t]here will be an unanswerable case when the day for the great clean up comes, to IMPLEMENT THE FINAL SOLUTION against these sub-human elements by means of the GAS CHAMBERS" - John Tyndall

"There's a difference between selling out your ideas and selling your ideas. And the British National Party isn't about selling out it's ideas, which are your ideas, but we are determined now to sell them. And that means basically to use these salable words. As I say, 'freedom', 'security', 'identity', 'democracy', nobody can criticise them, nobody can come at you and attack you on those ideas: they are salable. Perhaps one day, once by being rather more subtle, we got ourselves into a position where we control the British broadcasting media, then perhaps one day the British people might change their minds and say, 'Yes, every last one must go'. Perhaps they will one day, but if you offer that as your soul mate to start with, you're going to get absolutely nowhere. So, INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT RACIAL PURITY WE TALK ABOUT IDENTITY." - Nick Griffin addressing the Ku Klux Klan

"Voluntary repatriation. Isn't that EASIER TO SELL than compulsory repatriation for all?" - Nick Griffin

"I honestly don't hate asylum seekers - THESE PEOPLE ARE COCKROACHES *and they're doing what cockroaches do because cockroaches can't help what they do, they just do it, like cats miaow and dogs bark." - Mark Collett
*This is what the Hutus in Rwanda called the Tutsis of which 800,000-1 million were killed

"Well apparently didn't they get a lot of dentistry and plastic surgery." - Rotherham BNP's Marlene Guest, referring to horrific Nazi experiments on Jews and others during World War II.

"The idea that the Black African Bishop Sentamu, the Asian Muslim MP Shahid Malik, the part-Turkish Boris Johnson and the Jewish Lord Goldsmith have anything to teach the indigenous English about St. Georges Day is absurd." - John Lee Barnes

"When these Asians go out looking for a victim, they don't go looking for Asian victims. They don't go mugging Asian grandmas, they don't go stabbing each other, they don't go trying to solicit sex off little Pritesh or little Sanjita, they go straight to the whites because they are trying to destroy us and they are the racists." - Mark Collett

“All black people will be repatriated, even if they were born here. ” - Nick Griffin

"Black culture is totally inimical to the mental and spiritual development of young white people, encouraging laziness, lack of ambition in worthy pursuits, preoccupation with the trivial and the banal, appalling manners and absence of respect for others". - John Tyndall

"WHITE WORKING CLASS SCUM will be swept away by a future BNP government." - BNP councillor Simon Smith

"THE RICH ARE GENETICALLY SUPERIOR TO THE POOR." - Tony Lecomber

"I'm no apologist for WHITE WORKING CLASS SCUM." - BNP councillor Simon Smith

"Rest assured, all those HOMEGROWN TRATORS who have taken part in the war against our indigenous rights will one day be held to account for their crimes." - Nick Griffin

“I want to see Britain become the 99 per cent genetically white country she was just eleven years before I was born, and I want to die knowing that I have helped to set her on a course whereby her future genetic makeup will one day not even resemble that of January 1948, but that of July 1914. Nothing will ever turn me from working towards that final vision.” - Nick Griffin

"Rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal... [it] is like suggesting force-feeding a woman chocolate cake is a heinous offence." - Nick Eriksen

"Honestly now, would you prefer your kid growing up in Oldham and Burnley or 1930's Germany? It would be better for your child to grow up there." - Mark Collett

"Meanwhile, the indigenous side in the low-to-medium level civil war brewing in this country is getting its training. . .Its all going to get very messy." - Nick Griffin's blog on the BNP website

"It's clearly worth talking in terms of SIX-FIGURE SUMS to persuade families to go"- Nick Griffin, the Times, April 19, 2007

“We live in a country today which is unhealthily dominated by an EXCESS OF SENTIMENTALITY TOWARDS THE WEAK AND UNPRODUCTIVE. No good will come of it.” -Jeffrey Marshall (senior organiser for the BNP’s London European election campaign), 2009 after the death of Ivan Cameron.

“There is not a great deal of point in keeping these people alive after all.” Jeffrey Marshall again referring to Ivan Cameron.

"The capitalist free traders, the Marxists and organised Jewry have declared war on the white man, not just in Britain but in every nation on the planet". - Nick Griffin

Open your eyes. Open your ears. Open your mind.

This is not who you are.

British people have always been the true leader of the free world.

I know the times are hard and you're been used and abused but don't give up to such insanities and be your true self again.

Join here for more: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=8644741474

Petty day.

The story is simple.

Tomorrow is the D-Day in France where we celebrate the landing of the Allies on Normandy’s beaches leading to the defeat of the Third Reich. Like every year, emotional and official ceremonies will take place in Normandy itself with the heads of the countries who were the Allies (all English speaking and/or in the Commonwealth but for France).

Well almost all the leaders actually because Nicolas Sarkozy is now officially the biggest arsehole in the history of France after Pétain.

Sarkozy belongs to this right-wing breed of politicians we called "American dogs". He’s desperate to become America’s right arm and that was quite easy with a man like George W. Bush because they shared the same visions and politics so all he had to do was to come and fawn all over him and wait to be petted.

But now it’s Obama and it’s slighty more difficult (ie: impossible) to do so because Obama knows where Sarkozy is standing. He knows Sarkozy truly believes George W. Bush was a great man and he knows that the French President now wants to meet him to fake it, to fawn as well and tell him how wonderful he is. So basically, Obama doesn’t give a toss.

So Sarkozy came up with a plan. He learned his lesson after the last G-20 summit where Obama talked to everyone but him. So he decided to invite Washington but no one else for the D-Day. This way, he can have him for himself.

But it went terribly wrong because Washington unofficially complained to Paris through no-diplomatic channels about the Queen not being invited to the ceremony. They tried to avoid a major crisis and call for Sarkozy to fix the problem. But before he could act on it, he was asked by journalists why was the Queen not invited to the ceremonies.

He could’ve said the truth but no. In a pathetic attempt to hide it, he said: “The D-Day is a Franco-American matter. The Queen can come later”.

The Queen is actually the only one among all the heads of states to have known and lived the WWII. She was there. She was in London, she was working as a mechanic for the British Army under the bombs because she refused to leave her people who was scarifying so much to save the world from Hitler.

The United Kingdom was the one and only country in Europe who never collaborated in any way with Hitler, never surrendered anywhere in the world against him. It sheltered all the governments and resistances from Europe, gave them money, weapons and supported them until the end. Without Britain, the D-Day would have never existed. It was possible because that small island was here, so close to the Third Reich, resisting against a whole Europe who was now serving Hitler, and could be used as a giant training and stocking base for the Allies armies.

And their Queen doesn’t get invited at the D-Day because Sarkozy decided to rewrite history and use the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of men for its own interests?!

This is the pettiest, most appalling, ludicrous, pathetic, outrageous behaviour I have ever witnessed from a head of state in my life!

The only good side in all of this is that he wanted to be alone with Obama who now actually won’t have dinner with him privately but will spent a night with his family.

And Sarkozy will now have to entertain all the people he didn’t want but was forced to invite to avoid a huge diplomatic crisis: Prince Charles and Camilla, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister of Canada and Australia, the Head of Quebec and officials from India and many other countries that were Allies because they have been in the Commonwealth.

Mistaking uptight vulgarity for elegance

Let’s bitch, shall we? ^^

So je vais lui tailler un costard, that should put me a long-lasting good mood.Why would I bitch about that picture?

Because that’s exactly what’s wrong with Britain. They think Victoria Beckham and her whimpy over-botoxed and hair-geled cash machine of husband desperate for attention are the epitome of class.

So let’s make a list of what’s wrong here:

-The outfit, the dress: It could have been good without that fabric and colour first. It make it glitter, shinny, thus flashy thus cheap and worth of a boozy night in a whory club in Blackpool. I know New York Gala are close to that kind of night for it’s always full of slags and castrated males desperate for more fame, free goodies and free food.
Then the design. The flower-like thingy on the shoulder is far too big. But mostly that ‘traine’ behind is just wrong. The rest of it as well. That’s too much. That ruins the entire thing. You can see the guy didn’t follow Chanel’s advice to always get rid of the last thing you add. Or maybe the last thing was that think transparent black lining carrying that little black dots pattern.
On here: http://www.kickette.com/index.php?/site/comments/posing_in_polka_dots_victoria_beckham/ (the fourth picture) you can easily see how badly put together the dress was.
When it comes to the dress, the designer mistook simplicity and minimalism with childish patterns, bad quality work and too revealing shortness.

-The outfit: the shoes. Dreadful. Too high to begin with. I love high heel until it actually requires women to call their thighs for help. You can see how deform get the feet in those shoes. This is anything but sexy and nowhere near classy or chic. The platform high heels have always been made for hookers to look upon the crapy cars for the luxury ones and it won’t change. It’s cheap. The heels themselves: what with that shape? That makes them heavy and the shoes look like hammers! High heels are supposed to make the shape look thin and slender.
And what’s with the burbles thing? They look like plastic. At least it makes the shoes match the dress. Actually, too much. It’s like they add the Barbie Christmas Tree burbles after they realised the dress was going to be like this.

Her, now. Nothing authentic and that’s the problem. Fashion and elegance is not lying. It’s about taking what you have to turn it into fabulous. Not spent hundreds of thousands of pounds changing everything to look like the pages of a catalogue. “Look at me: I’m page 26, 28, 68 and 154. Isn’t it great?” No, it is not! It's sad!

The make up: Horrendous. Fake tan and far too much make up on the face. I don’t even mention rest of the body for you must be insane to make up there in the first place.You can clearily see the fake eyelashes, the tonnes of eye-liner or whatever and once again that ghastly glittering silver you have on the dress and the shoes burbles.
The foundation on the (fake) cheek bones make them look even more wrong and bigger while you can see the colour is going all the way over her entire forehead.
Fake nose, fake lips, fake cheekbones, botoxed to the bones…Her and David can’t even sneeze anymore for fear of draining their whole face.

She is far too thin, fake in everyway, always pouting, absolutely no character and so anally retaintive she can't sit for fear of sucking up the furniture! She is mistaking uptight vulgarity for elegance. She looks like she got an open umbrella up her arse but she is not bothered because she thinks the Armani label on the very umbrella makes everything alright. She is going to end up like Ivana Trump. Gross and pale caricature of every single rich bitch that - yes, "that"!...that thinks you’re beautiful the way you are not, just the way you pay to be.

That’s sad. What’s even sadder is that I have girls as young as 13 coming in my classrooms with as much make up as Miss Uptight For Life and I can’t help taking a real pleasure humiliating them after we asked ten times to stop painting themselves as brand new Christmas toys. Last time, I just looked at the girl and said in front of a full yet silent classroom: “Are you alright, dear? Your make up’s so thick, I can’t get a read"

(Thanks to Céline who noticed three words at the end of the article had just vanished.)

Sarkozy struggles to get close to 'my friend Barack'

Very nice piece form Charles this week ^^

Nicolas Sarkozy finally gets a chance to talk to President Obama today. Phone calls between leaders may be routine, but so desperate is the French President to get time with "my friend Barack" that the Elysée Palace is casting today's video conference via interpreters as a virtual summit.

The coolness of the US President towards enthusiastic overtures from Paris is embarrassing Mr Sarkozy. It has dampened his hopes of finding a kindred dynamic soul in Washington and founding a new Paris-Washington axis. And it is leading him to realise that he will find few takers for his ambitious plans for "refounding capitalism" at the G20 summit in London next week.

China is out. After making waves over Tibet and human rights last year, France is in Beijing's doghouse and Mr Sarkozy is the only leader to have been refused a session in London with President Hu Jintao. Mr Sarkozy annoyed President Calderon of Mexico with his behaviour on a visit there this month. Turkey abhors Mr Sarkozy's permanent veto of its entry to the European Union. Relations with his European neighbours, Gordon Brown and Angela Merkel of Germany, are are not much better than "cordial", which is diplomatic for bumpy...

More:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/world_agenda/article5973832.ece

L'Italie est un nid de cons!

Juve defender Nicola Legrottaglie has called on gay people to visit him for correction. Legrottaglie doing the PR for his new book, says being gay is "bad":

"Being a gay is seen as a fashion statement these days. For many it's a way of being contrary. However, it's clear that to be gay is to be wrong. I can only advise gay people to read the Bible and change - and my personal discussion meetings on Mondays are open to all of them. Some gays nowdays even have a wife. That's taking it too far."

My personal discussion meetings?

He obviously thinks he's a lady of the French bourgeoisie from one of Léon Tolstoi's book having her salon mondain every same day of the week.

Isn't Italy a great country?

They have the Pope calling gays the greatest danger to humanity and the condoms the reason why AIDS is spreading. To mention the least...

They have Berluconi so no comment!

And they think it's perfectly normal to be openly fascist, Catholic integrist, intolerant, calling for hatered when not anihilation of everything that doesn't abide by their interpretation of the Bible...as most of their cherished beloved footballers are...

How about we spent more time fighting THESE extremists who are at the very center of Europe and calling for the death and annihilation of everyone's different instead of ruining ourselves and the world in pointless wars in the Middle East?

I don't know whether being gay is a fashion statement in Italy but one thing's for sure: being a intolerant self-righteous fucking arsehole is indeed very fashionable over there!

Ray Mears is a hypocritical judgemental pompous bore.

For those who don’t know him, he’s an very annoying English man who comes up with an absolute boring TV show named after ‘Ray Mears’s extreme survival’.

So yes, you got it! It’s the kind of utter fake shows with a man surrounded by a entire filming crew who goes to some supposedly very dangerous places the likes of deserts…to show us how wonderful is the “natural genuine life”.

When the man is cute, you somehow enjoy watching him with some dirty make up taking a bath in a freezing cold river. But Ray Mears is a typical English man: tall, paler than aspirin and 30 kilos overweight.



Here is a man who supposedly spends his life on the “extreme survival” mode but remains always as white as snow in the desert and obviously overweight. In spite of the fact that we saw him telling us that, in some forest no one cares about, you can only eat ants to survive. Maybe they were deep fried ants the size of XXL fish and chips?

When it comes to being filmed as he moves further deep into the jungle, we always see him from the front. Which means that the cameraman and the man with the big microphone are before him moving backwards in the virgin very dangerous jungle to record that fat bugger surviving extreme conditions.

The worst from Ray Mears is his utterly unbearable excitement for everything that is said to be “true and genuine”. So not like the life we are living now. He’s exactly the kind of Western man full of hackneyed clichés on our dreadful way of life here in Europe versus the wonderful so honest and pure way of life people have in the desert and jungle.

So with some luxurious Land Rover 4x4, GPS, Satellite navigators, filming crew, Dr Martens, Lacoste Polo and Rollex watch, he goes to see the tribes in Australia and praise the parents for forbidding their children to use matches when they want to spark some fire.

And he grants us with some brilliantly hackneyed rant on how important it is for them to learn how to light a fire without matches but rubbing some sticks on one another. He says this is part of their heritage to know how to do it, part of who they really are and, without even thinking for a second, tells us we should all do the same because: how wonderful, ain’t it?

Everytime, we have the fire without matches. Everytime!

For God’s sake, you bloody halfwit, we came up with matches for a reason! It’s not because we are some evil Western First World imperialists who want to destroy the world that we invented matches. That’s because it’s easier! It's so we don’t have to spend three hours trying to make some stupid fire.

Yes! There are some actual good reasons we have the telephone, we build houses in stone or concrete, we use matches to light fire and came up with agriculture and husbandry.

Ray, if you were to come with some of them and show all those genuine natural men how it works, trust me they would throw the sticks together on a pile and light them with the matches and use their time to go hunting and try to improve their 35-years life-experiency. And the head of the village or whatever would be ready to give you his utter submissive wife in exchange for a life supply of matches!

I hate those guys. Those guys who go to the other side of the world with all the means the civilisation is giving them just to tell us how bad is that very civilisation next to the way of life some tribes have. Those guys who are blindly excited by people living like we used to more than 3000 years ago just for the sake of “genuine”. If those people live like this it’s mainly because in the middle of the desert and the jungle, they didn’t have the opportunities we had in the grasslands and welcoming forest of Europe or China. They adapted and survived just like we did.

I hate those guys because all those men would never ever forsake their way of life but think it is wonderful for those poor kids to have their parents teaching them that fire is to be lit with sticks, house build with light wood, food to be brought after ten hours of hunting with wooden bow and arrows just to get a mice and a handful of poisonous berries.

I don’t approve everything we do over here. The fact that we are basically some ants sleeping, commuting, working, commuting, sleeping, commuting, working…and trying to forget about that useless way of life with pointless leisure, entertainment or/and religion.

But I don’t think their life is actually any better or worse then ours just because they live closer to the men we used to be milleniums ago. It's just bloody utterly different!

I hate Ray Mears for he’s of those guys who are just some utter judgmental ignorant ethnocentric idiots who always compare people while comparing French and English is already irrevelant. So, how about a bush tribe man in Australia and a England young man in Stafford?

Don’t worry, we have the same self-rigtheous right-minded gushy crétin in France: Nicolas Hulot!

Video posting

So...I wanted to post the video of the last Lily Allen video clip, The Fear. Brillant song of a brillant artist with a beautiful voice. Everything I like.

But for some reason, Google blogger can't take it any fucking real fucking player fucking videos any fucking more! Real player is the format with which you read the videos you download from the Internet itself.

I tried with some videos of Xabi Forever Mister Super Extra Cute Alonso a few weeks ago and it didn't work but I thought it was just a one time thing.

So they tell you to go on the help section which is probably the very most pathetic piece of helping section I've ever experienced in my entire life! It's not helping you, it gives you directions to upload a picture or a video.

In one word: Bollocks!!

Same old song…

…and that’s country music! Holy Hell, help us all!

Last month, in an outrageous orgy of self congratulation and self-righteousness, America send a message to the world: “That’s it, the world is saved. Thanks to almighty us” And I was told I should be grateful America finally came to her/his/its – or whatever! – senses after almost ten years and decided to elect someone else that a moronic, boorish, intolerant and religiously (protestant) extremist mama’s boy who’s solely driven by his own interests and the ones of those who openly and shamelessly pour money in his pocket. Not to mention the childish burning desire to prove his father wrong: “Dad, I’m not a hopeless coward loser!”

“The world is saved, a new era’s begun. No more Bush, no more ignorance, no more lies and secrets…” as we were told here in Europe by those from the other side of the Atlantic. CBS got even further claiming that Obama was like Maria Theresa. That he was like Jesus Christ!

Well, actually nothing has changed. In the middle of this week, judges in England came in position of the most obvious pieces of evidence of torture from Guantanamo Bay prisons. According to the laws of the democracy and motherland of modern justice that is England, laws of the European Union, all the Geneva Conventions we Europeans all signed and according the Human Rights we are relentlessly fighting for, a judge must make these pieces of evidence public.

It’s not just a little game, we spent the last 90 years doing everything we could in Europe to follow our democratic ideal and make torture disappear (altogether!) thus force anyone in position of evidence to come forward.

Well, few hours after Hilary Clinton praised the rebirth of the special relationship opening that so-called new era of the saved world, those same judges were told to literally shut the fuck up after the United States threatened the United Kingdom to make the whole intelligence cooperation come to an end if they kept going with their revelations.

That’s where the matter is.

Obama was not elected because America cares about the world. He’s here because suddenly Americans woke up facing the consequences of their actions in the world after they started to undermine their everyday way of life and they got scared. He’s not here to save the world but to actually make the world so that America can rise again from the crisis. “Change we need” is not for us or anything but just for them.

It’s normal after all when you really think about it. Despite most of Americans thinking of themselves as living in the Promise Land, in spite of them not being able to describe anything that’s not related to their everyday life and thinking they are the world, Obama was not elected President of the World but President of the United States.

So why am I supposed to be grateful for anything?

We were said that things would change. But they won’t. Not for us, not for the world. Just for them so I have nothing to be grateful for because we, “the allies”, “the friends” (more the dogs, I have to say) are in the exact same position as we were with Bush.

For America, we are the followers. And unfortunately our leaders (from Britain, France now, Italy, Eastern Europe) are far too scare and have this dreadful lack of back bone to do anything else than being the followers. And when you’re a follower – “friend” for those who love politically correct - you can’t open your mouth without asking or you well get the stick. You can if you have a good master. But America is not a good master.

America is a bad master because it is nothing but a twelve year old bully from the schoolyard whose idea of power and strength is to beat the hell out of everyone and everything that gets on its way. And whose idea of friends is people who are solely frightened servants who learn to shut up if they want to remain in the group.

America’s so sunk into its over-confidence for it believes everything it does is for the right cause that Americans don’t even realise they are exactly like their worst enemies and don’t hesitate threatening their friends of retaliation if they dare speaking up a bit. Exactly like USSR used to do with its “sister republics”, Russia now with its former “allies”, China with Tibet…countries they assume to be under their domination. And just like all those former USSR republics, we are living under a ever-growing loath of that master and longing for the day we will finally get rid of it.

And America doesn’t realise that either. I have a childhood best friend who’s American and through her I met so many people who can’t even believe anyone can hate them! For them, 9/11 was not just a shock because of the death and the scale of destruction, they were baffled: “How can the world do that to us?”

They genuinely did not understand because they were brought up believe so deeply that every moves, not matter how horrendous and murderous they might be, are always justified and for the good of the world, that America is utterly unquestionable.

That’s exactly what happened this week: How come Britain dares to question the goodwill of the United States while they’ve been sacrifying so much for the good of Humanity?

But that’s torture we are talking about. Elizabeth I was quite amazed how any man could confess to anything under torture. Torture me and I’ll give you anything!

I know most Americans will use this opportunity to remind me that I’m French so they’re not surprised. I am one the “losers”, the softies who don’t know what it takes to fight. And that I should be grateful no matter what because “if it wasn’t for America, I’ll be speaking German”.

Well let me answer that if I wasn’t for France and Lafayette, America would still be British! And that France is actually the country which has the best victory record in the entire world throughout history. But I’m not surprised a country that labels everything prior to the Continental Congress as “pre-historical” doesn’t take that into account.

And there is now the major difference between Europe and America.

Rumsfeld, who turned out to be the biggest lying sack of sh!t of them all, was very proud after he labelled Europe as the “old ancient world” whose time was over. He was so happy with his newly found insult that it didn’t even realise we took it as a compliment. It’s exactly like parents looking at their teenage girl who’s turning violent and reckless calling them ‘boring and overdue’. We just answer: “Whatever you need to tell yourself, dear. But we were you once so we know what we are talking about”

All of that rant to say once again America allowed the terrorists, the enemies of free democratic regimes to record a brilliant victory. Without even lifting a finger, they managed to make us betray ourselves, deny who we truly are and fighting to protect. They managed to have Washington make democracy go through huge set back and set us a step further to dictatorship in the name of that very democracy, freedom and Liberty.